Glass is beautiful. It is not just there to interrupt brick. It is not just there to let in light (though that is one of its best properties). It is not just anything. It is a thing in its own right. Here are some of the best examples of the use of glass as a thing onto itself.
one. Sports and Leisure Center in Saint-Cloud France
Colour. Glass. Beauty.
two. Selgas Cano Architecture Office
This wonderful office of The Selgas Cano Architecture group is hidden away from the world in a beautiful Spanish forest. The workers here are consistently tied to environment, they know the seasons and they feel them change around them. This is the power of glass here: To connect through the practical boundaries that living and working requires.
three. Sears Tower Glass Balconies
A new addition to one of the most famous buildings in America these incredible balconies extend away from near the great buildings high peak at 1,353 feet. A nerve wrecking experience for most, and an impossible one for those who suffer from vertigo, they are an incredible feet of glass and engineering and a reminder of glass’s ability to transform the reality of buildings and the experience of being in a building.
four. Farnsworth House by Mies van der Rohe
When built the Farnsworth House by Mies van der Rohe it was a modernist master piece that set the standard of beauty, refinery and clean design for a generation.
five. Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art
My personal favourite because of how it juxtaposes with the older buildings next to it, making it look even more otherworldly and provoking what amounts to a conversation of style, of aesthetics and of architectural design between the two buildings. The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City, MO have added this new outer wing to counter-pose its original Roman-style institution. The ‘Bloch Building’ is formed of frosted glass and pours light out into the atmosphere.
Thank you for reading. Any other suggestions for creative and beautiful use of glass are welcome in the comments below.
The urban environment is one defined as much by its physical streams of connection and absence as its mental ones. Where do people meet in the city? Where do people connect? What is it that drives some people together and some people apart? Why, even in the most diverse of cities, do people so often only mix with those of their own ilk? Do you know what I mean by this? Let’s for a moment look at two famous depictions of life in perhaps the most iconic western metropolis: New York.
Yes, Seinfeld and Friends. According to science there were only 19 African-American speaking characters across all the nine seasons of Seinfeld. There are also not many in friends and most are waiters or in the service industry until they got guilty and hurried in a black love interest for Ross to get all the everyone of their back. So, is this a gross misrepresentation of one of the most diverse cities in America? Is this the white washing of the big diverse apple? Well maybe, but…
… it also should be remembered that diversity does not necessarily precede actual mixing of different types of people, because cities have a structure beyond the walls and concrete that filters people into streams that you sometimes cannot even see. And in certain cities, at certain times, many people may well only actually mix with anyone outside of the demographic they grew up with on the street, or in shops, or (maybe) at work. This is probably less true now in American cities, but in the times of Seinfeld it is not at all unlikely that 4 young Jewish Americans from privileged background would be able to spend their lives in each others lives and in few other types of people. People are segregated into many streams as is shown by how advertisers will target specific of streams with apparent ease by putting themselves in certain physical, social and cultural spaces which they know are the cultural property of certain groups. You can reach out to students (http://www.campussolutionsinc.com) you can reach out specifically to any type of person. Cities should be built to destroy these streams, to turn us into a free flowing free mixing river. That’s the way to do it.
Co-constructing is the process by which governmental housing organisations and tenants of the area work together, both financially and creatively, to construct housing. This involves recognising that people know things about how they want to live, where they want to live, and how to find solutions to the issues surrounding housing in their area. This involves being able to relate and communicate outside of the industries that normally take control of these operations. This is what this involves, this and much more. How much much more? Well, much much more.
More. That is what we are looking for here. More than what has been built and done before. More than the crap that people have been forced into before. More than housing that was poorly thought through, poorly built, and poorly explained. More than repeating the mistakes and excuses of the past. More than dull. More than drab. More than uninspired, uninspiring, unthoughtful, un-hopeful, careless bullshit. More than that.
Many furniture producers now sell their furniture in all its composite parts (i.e http://www.finsahome.co.uk/) what does this mean? It means we can simply gather parts and people can construct the kitchen they want! People can have creative involvement in creating the spaces in which they are going to live eventually. This means they can choose, they can create, the can decide, they can do. And they can do the things that will make their lives easier and better. They can do this, if only they are given the opportunity. But we really involve the people who are actually going to be inhabiting the places we design. People devote their professional lives to trying to figure out what people might want. What will they want? How do they live? What is it like to be them? What it is that like? Well, that’s hard to figure out, maybe ask them. Maybe, erm, ask them. MAYBE, ERM, ASK THEM.
Hello and welcome to my fine website. My name is Christov Kudaluchek and I hold urban design in high esteem. It is a worthy and important endeavour to study this topic this I believe very much. I have lived a long and interesting life in many different countries and under many different rulers and types of rule. I have seen all types of cities made in all types of ways for all types of people for all types of reasons. Cities can be oppressive, they can be liberating, they can hide and they can expose, they can be the most human but the least humane. They are a wonderful pile of human conflict and contradiction and creativity. They are an attack and a defeat. They are all of everything and I am fascinated by how they come to be.
On this site I will discuss just that. Enjoy…